![]() From 2001-2007, there’s no contest that System Preferences is better organized than Windows XP’s control panel. Settings layout: this one is opinion I’ve always found Windows settings horribly organized. Otherwise, isn’t “apps are files, drag to install, cmd-delete or drag to trash to uninstall” objectively simpler than using a wizard to install, and digging around in a control panel to uninstall?įunction key row: you can swap the behavior of the fn row so that the keys send Fn1-Fn12 by default, and needs the fn key held down to send commands like “volume up”. Uninstall vs delete: apps installed from the Mac App Store can be uninstalled from launchpad. Start menu to see all apps: this is called “Launchpad”, and is in the Dock by default for new macOS users, but can be removed. This typically has better number-of-keypress to get the window you want compared to Windows alt-tab which requires iterating over all windows in the worst case. I usually end up frustrated at things that work on Windows but don't on MacOS, but rarely vice versa.ĭesktop peek: Part of “Mission Control”: spread thumb and 3 fingers, or press Fn+F11.Īlt tab: press cmd-tab to cycle applications, then cmd-` to cycle windows of that application. And I still use Windows for work, but use Mac in personal usage. Many of my friends are masters of switching windows with Expose, which I absolutely despise. That said, I've used Windows for almost 15 years now, and I think many of its choices are second nature to me. In some cases, an actual function key row The concept of uninstalling an application vs just deleting the application Better settings, especially when it comes to relevant settings being in one place File Explorer is much more full-featured than Finder A start menu for seeing all your applications A modern/fully-featured default web browser without a locked down extension ecosystem. Alt-tab, especially when it comes to apps with multiple windows, and windows in different states, such as minimized ![]() Quick hide-all-windows to copy something from your desktop to your clipboard, then bring everything back The window history thing, Timeline, is something that I have disabed, but honestly sounds like an even better version of Recent Files, which is something many people use and might like something more full featured. I think that Windows again has the superior implementation here.Īero shake was pretty terrible, no arguments here. that's exactly how I would expect virtual desktops to behave? If it only changed a single monitor, does that mean you'd have to go to each monitor to change to a different virtual desktop? Do you see virtual desktop configurations specific to each screen, or any screen? What happens if your screens are different resolutions. I don't currently use multiple monitors, but I do use virtual desktops, and. But anyways, that choice is made available to you. It lets me treat recent tabs the same way as I would treat recent applications, which many websites effectively are. Alt-tab to switch between browser tabs in Edge is new, a setting that you can turn off, and in some cases, it's actually very useful, since you can limit the number of tabs. I tested several versions in the past, but I'm not satisfied with some features so I'm still using ISE :)Īs a students I have not the chance to try some professional tools from Aldec, Mentor. This plugin is under constant development and still increasing in its features. The mentioned Sigasi Eclipse plugin (there is also e free version) is new on the market and has some advantages. If you are familiar with state-of-the art coding environments like Visual Studio, SharDevelop, MonoDevelop, Eclipse or NetBeans then I would say coding HDLs is still in the stone-age !!Īll big vendors offer free HDL toolchains, which are paided by the devices, but these tools are only multi-tabbed text editors with a design hierarchy viewer and some buttons to hide the command line tool executions. ghdl is very fast, but does not support all (advanced) VHDL features. The Xilinx simulators iSim (included in ISE) and xSim (included in Vivado) are good enough for every day simulations. In my opinion (Quartus) ModelSim / QuestaSim is not lightweight. You can write some scripts (I would advice PowerShell) to automate the compilation or you can use a build tool. the output is a waveform file, which can be viewed/inspected by gtkwave. GHDL is a command line tool to compile VHDL files and "simulate" them. ![]() There are ports of the linux programs GHDL and GTKwave for windows: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |